Assessment of Medical Clowning in Influencing the Anxiety and Behavior Scores of Children Undergoing Various Dental Treatments and the Stress Levels of the Operator.

Aim: To investigate the potential effectiveness of "medical clowns" on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anxiety of children undergoing various dental treatments and also its effect on the operator's stress levels in a dental setup. Materials and methods: A total of 170 pediatric patients, aged 4-8 years, indicated for preventive therapy, extractions, restorative, and endodontics were included and divided into two groups [group I-audiovisual (A-V) aids; group II-medical clowns], group of 85 patients each after recording Modified yale preoperative scale. Both pre- and postoperatively, Frankl's behavior score was recorded for each patient. During treatment, the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain scale, and dental operator's stress level were recorded. Results: Intervention of medical clowns positively influenced children during dental treatment by increasing their pain threshold. The majority of children showed positive Frankl rating scales after dental treatment. Also, the operator's stress was significantly reduced, which led to enhanced treatment outcomes. Conclusion: Humor yields the power of healing, distracts pediatric patients, reduces their anxiety, and alleviates their pain, conferring the patients with a sense of laughter, creativity, and care.Therefore, medical clowns in pediatric dentistry can prove to be serviceable and valuable as a nonpharmacological approach to behavior management. How to cite this article: Aggarwal P, Mathur S, Chopra R. Assessment of Medical Clowning in Influencing the Anxiety and Behavior Scores of Children Undergoing Various Dental Treatments and the Stress Levels of the Operator. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(1):59-66.

Adopt-A-Classroom Program: A Potential Platform to Address the Root of Health Disparities in the US.

The underrepresentation of Black doctors is a significant issue in the US that led to the perpetuation of health disparities in the African American community. Racial and ethnic minorities in the US have been shown to have higher rates of chronic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, as well as higher rates of obesity and premature death compared to White people. While Blacks make up more than 13% of the US population, they comprise only 4% of US doctors and less than 7% of medical students. It is believed that this problem requires more deliberate efforts by policymakers and the educational establishment, not only at the undergraduate and medical school level, but earlier in the educational "pipeline"-the K-12 school system. While the medical field is rooted in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), we have launched a new initiative that will provide year-round STEM development activities for K-12 education in Connecticut in Hartford and Waterbury districts, especially among populations with health disparities.

Embracing ChatGPT for Medical Education: Exploring Its Impact on Doctors and Medical Students.

ChatGPT (OpenAI), a cutting-edge natural language processing model, holds immense promise for revolutionizing medical education. With its remarkable performance in language-related tasks, ChatGPT offers personalized and efficient learning experiences for medical students and doctors. Through training, it enhances clinical reasoning and decision-making skills, leading to improved case analysis and diagnosis. The model facilitates simulated dialogues, intelligent tutoring, and automated question-answering, enabling the practical application of medical knowledge. However, integrating ChatGPT into medical education raises ethical and legal concerns. Safeguarding patient data and adhering to data protection regulations are critical. Transparent communication with students, physicians, and patients is essential to ensure their understanding of the technology's purpose and implications, as well as the potential risks and benefits. Maintaining a balance between personalized learning and face-to-face interactions is crucial to avoid hindering critical thinking and communication skills. Despite challenges, ChatGPT offers transformative opportunities. Integrating it with problem-based learning, team-based learning, and case-based learning methodologies can further enhance medical education. With proper regulation and supervision, ChatGPT can contribute to a well-rounded learning environment, nurturing skilled and knowledgeable medical professionals ready to tackle health care challenges. By emphasizing ethical considerations and human-centric approaches, ChatGPT's potential can be fully harnessed in medical education, benefiting both students and patients alike.

"Passenger Announcement: Is there a doctor on board?" Tackling impostor phenomenon in the transition from medical student to foundation doctor.

Imposter phenomenon (IP) is the internalised experience of self-doubt or mediocracy that leads an individual to believe they do not belong. IP is increasingly recognised across the medical field, from medical school to consultancy, but likely affects different groups to varying extents. The transition in role from medical student to junior doctor can be a time of particularly high stress and insecurities about one's ability can act as a trigger or exacerbator of IP. Foundation doctors can arm themselves against IP by first acknowledging its existence and then actively attempting to dismantle these flawed misconceptions, as well as accessing support and resources available ubiquitously through the foundation programme.

The Rights of Physicians and Future Physicians Who Are Lactating, Breastfeeding, or Chestfeeding: An American Medical Women's Association Position Article.

Breastfeeding is a fundamental and biologically normal function with well-established benefits for both lactating parents and infants. Despite these benefits, physicians, particularly those in training, often face significant obstacles when attempting to meet their breastfeeding and pumping goals. In response to these challenges, the American Medical Women's Association (AMWA) and a diverse group of health care professionals have come together to advocate for comprehensive lactation support policies in medical learning environments and workplaces. This position article highlights the ethical necessity of comprehensive lactation support in medical educational and workplace settings, emphasizing the importance of not only providing physical accommodations but also fostering a cultural shift, educational initiatives, and policy reforms to empower lactating parents. It offers an examination of the difficulties encountered by lactating parents within medical environments and proposes guidelines for the formulation and enhancement of supportive policies. The position article envisions a future where medical professionals can thrive in both their careers and parenthood through collaborative efforts and a commitment to the key elements of Effective Lactation Support Programs in medical workplaces based on the following: (1) well-equipped lactation facilities, (2) customized work schedules, (3) mentorship and support networks, (4) lactation support in clinical settings, and (5) research and advocacy.

Prevalence of Vocal Fatigue Due to the Use of Facial Protective Gear in Teaching Medical Professionals.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, masks have become far more widely used by doctors and are now commonplace in the hospital, with many professionals still wearing them for extended amounts of time. Emerging literature describing numerous mask-related difficulties prompted the authors to conduct a study aimed at assessing the self-perceived impact on voices of teaching doctors due to facial protective gear. In this study carried out from October 2021 to March 2022, data was gathered from 170 pre-, para-, and clinical professionals who were involved in offline teaching. Over half of teaching medical professionals were found to be vocally fatigued. Pre and para-clinical professionals have greater vocal tiredness and avoidance than clinical doctors (p = 0.016). The type of mask used does not make a significant difference in degree of vocal fatigue. Individuals with lingering respiratory difficulties following COVID-19 were significantly more vocally fatigued than their recovered peers (p value for tiredness and avoidance = 0.010). Thus, teaching doctors are at risk of impaired quality of life due to vocal fatigue. Further research on vocal habits and rest practices in the study population may help identify the most effective interventions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04350-8.

A latent profile analysis of doctors' joy in work at public hospitals.

Introduction: When doctors' work stress increases, their joy in work decreases, severely affecting the quality of care and threatening patient safety. Analysis of the latent categories of joy in work of doctors in public hospitals and the differences in the characteristics of each category can help uncover hidden messages that enhance doctors' joy in work. Methods: Questionnaires were administered to 426 doctors working in public hospitals using the general information questionnaire and the public hospital doctor's joy in work evaluation scale. Upon identifying their potential categories using latent profile analysis, chi-square test, and multinomial logistic regression were performed to analyze the differences in the characteristics of each category. Results: The 426 public hospital doctors could be divided into three potential categories: "low joy in work" (11.27%), "medium joy in work" (59.86%), and "high joy in work" (28.87%). Most of the doctors did not have much joy in work, with 71.13% of them having "low to medium joy in work." Doctors who work in secondary or tertiary hospitals, have a personnel agency or contract, and are older than 45 years are more likely to belong to the "low joy in work" category. Some of the protective factors are having an average monthly income (RMB) of 10,001-15,000 yuan and having a fair or good self-rated health status. Conclusion: There are obvious classification characteristics of doctors' level of joy in work. Hospital managers can take commensurate actions to improve their joy in work, thereby improving patient safety and the quality of medical services.

The importance of creating the right conditions for group intervision sessions among medical residents- a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The burnout rates among residents urge for adequate interventions to improve resilience and prevent burnout. Peer reflection, also called group intervision sessions, is a potentially successful intervention to increase the resilience of young doctors. We aimed to gain insight into the perceived added value of intervision sessions and the prerequisite conditions to achieve this, according to residents and intervisors. Our insights might be of help to those who think of implementing intervision sessions in their institution. METHODS: An explorative, qualitative study was performed using focus groups and semi-structured interviews with both residents (n = 8) and intervisors (n = 6) who participated in intervision sessions in a university medical center in the Netherlands. The topic list included the perceived added value of intervision sessions and factors contributing to that. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using NVivo. Thematic analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS: According to residents and intervisors, intervision sessions contributed to personal and professional identity development; improving collegiality; and preventing burn-out. Whether these added values were experienced, depended on: (1) choices made during preparation (intervisor choice, organizational prerequisites, group composition, workload); (2) conditions of the intervision sessions (safety, depth, role of intervisor, group dynamics, pre-existent development); and (3) the hospital climate. CONCLUSIONS: Intervision sessions are perceived to be of added value to the identity development of medical residents and to prevent becoming burned out. This article gives insight in conditions necessary to reach the added value of intervision sessions. Optimizing preparation, meeting prerequisite conditions, and establishing a stimulating hospital climate are regarded as key to achieve this.

Trans-Inclusive Communication and Self-Perceived Barriers to It, as Reported by Doctors-A Mixed-Methods Survey in Germany.

The majority of transgender and gender-nonconforming people (TGNC) report negative experiences with doctors in the healthcare system. As there is little knowledge about the communication behaviour of doctors towards TGNC, this survey aimed to assess the self-reported trans-inclusive communication of doctors and their willingness to communicate trans-inclusively, as well as their self-perceived barriers to it. A mixed-methods survey was applied for this. Firstly, we measured self-reported trans-inclusive communication behaviour based on the CommTrans questionnaire. Based on this, the overall willingness, as well as self-perceived barriers (qualitative) to communication, were assessed. In total, N = 57 doctors took part in the survey. Most participants reported not introducing themselves using pronouns (79.4%). Of these, 61.4% said that they would not be able to do this in the future either. Perceived barriers were classified into the following eight categories: necessity, sample-dependency, habit, structural barriers in practice, uncertainties in dealing with the topic, limits of patient-centredness, gender as a binary concept, and transphobia. In summary, doctors in Germany show different degrees of trans-inclusive communication. It is likely that this has a negative effect on TGNC, their health and access to the healthcare system.

Enhancing Stoma Care Education for Junior Doctors: A Comprehensive Teaching Series.

Introduction Colorectal stomas are prevalent in surgical wards and demand careful medical attention, particularly in stoma management. Junior doctors play a vital role in this care, but their limited exposure and training may hinder their ability, impacting patient care. Given the dearth of literature, we aimed to assess junior doctors' stoma care knowledge and the efficacy of a specialized teaching course in boosting their confidence and skills. Methods The research, conducted at the West Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust in the UK, engaged 60 junior doctors, predominantly from Foundation Year 1 and Year 2, from August 2021 to December 2022. To ensure effective management and assessment, participants were divided into four groups, each comprising 15 doctors. A pivotal aspect of the study was implementing a structured stoma teaching series delivered by a panel of seasoned surgical experts. This series, conducted every Friday for three weeks, comprehensively covered all facets of stoma care. Both before and after the teaching series, assessments were administered to measure the impact of this educational intervention on the participants' understanding of stomas. The study meticulously adhered to ethical guidelines, with all participants providing informed consent, and measures were implemented to guarantee anonymity, thus safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of all individuals involved. The primary objective of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of the stoma teaching series in augmenting the knowledge and comprehension of stomas among junior doctors. The findings of this study hold significant potential in guiding healthcare professionals toward developing more efficacious stoma education programs, ultimately leading to improved patient care outcomes. Results The study involved 60 junior doctors categorized into four groups from August 2021 to December 2022. It aimed to assess their understanding of colorectal stomas, focusing on complications and their knowledge about stoma appliances and care nurses. A questionnaire was used to evaluate their knowledge in these areas at the start of their surgical rotation, which showed significant knowledge gaps among participants. Of the 60 participants, 48 (80%) expressed slight or no confidence in basic stoma care, while 54 (90%) admitted unfamiliar with managing stoma complications. Astonishingly, all 60 (100%) participants lacked awareness of fundamental stoma care concepts. Significant improvements were observed following a comprehensive stoma teaching series covering basic stoma knowledge, its complications and management, and practical stoma care. Feedback from the course revealed positive outcomes, with 54 (87%) doctors feeling confident or very confident in basic stoma knowledge and 48 (80%) reporting increased familiarity with managing stoma complications. Remarkably, all 60 (100%) doctors indicated comfort with stoma care concepts after the sessions. Participants emphasized the course's value in medical education and professional development, citing enhanced practical skills such as communication and teamwork. Conclusion Our study revealed junior doctors' limited stoma knowledge, emphasizing the need for a dedicated teaching program that significantly improves their understanding. Focused stoma education is vital for junior doctors to deliver optimal patient care, necessitating hospitals to promote awareness for improved patient outcomes.

Clinicians' Attitudes Toward Electronic Health Records in Saudi Arabia.

AIM:  This study explored physicians' and nurses' attitudes toward an electronic health record (EHR) system and examined the features and factors that clinicians associated with the implementation of EHR systems. METHODS:  A self-administered anonymous questionnaire with high reliability and validity was adopted from existing research to gather clinicians' attitudes toward the EHR system implemented at King Khalid University Hospital, one of the biggest hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS:  A total of 438 questionnaire responses were received from the participants; 240 of them were physicians and 198 were nurses. The participants had a mean age of 43.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 17.1), 213 (52.7%) were female and 207 (47.3%) were male. Most participants (424, 96.8%) had one or more years of experience using computers, and a majority (304, 69.4%) had one or more years of experience using EHR systems. Most physicians and nurses (214, 89.5% vs. 174, 87.9%) were satisfied with their hospital's EHR system and felt that the system was highly usable and had the potential to improve communication between staff, facilitate easy storage of and access to information and lead to improved health outcomes for patients. The study found positive attitudes among clinicians concerning the quality of training and education around the new system (178, 74.2% of physicians vs. 142, 71.7% of nurses; p > 0.05) and toward leadership during the transition to HER (222, 92.5% vs. 183, 92.4%). On the other hand, a majority of nurses reported that the EHR system took longer to use and increased their workload compared with the previous analogue system (115 (47.9%) vs. 133 (67.2%); p ≤ 0.01 and 46.7% vs. 112 (64.1%)). A large majority of physicians and nurses surveyed (214 (89.2%) vs. 167 (84.3%)) stated that clinicians should be consulted in the design of such systems as a way to maximise the potential benefits of EHR and mitigate extra workload demands. CONCLUSION:  Most clinicians expressed overall satisfaction with the EHR system, but there were some areas of dissatisfaction among the respondents, such as increasing workload and stress among nurses. There is scope for further research to continue to explore physicians' and nurses' attitudes toward EHRs and for future experimental studies that examine the impact of EHRs on clinician workloads, patient health outcomes and quality of care.

A novel whole-team training programme for adult eating disorder services in England: rationale, development and preliminary evaluation.

AIMS AND METHOD: In response to recommendations for improving the quality and coordination of care delivered by eating disorder services, a whole-team training programme was commissioned by Health Education England in 2020. This paper describes the development and evaluation of the Eating Disorder Services for Adults (EDSA) whole-team training course, delivered to National Health Service adult eating disorder community teams in England. Course participants (n = 561) in the first two EDSA training cohorts (2021 and 2022) were asked to complete questionnaires at intake and after each session, asking about their views on the training. RESULTS: All course aspects were rated as highly enjoyable, meeting participants' training needs and fostering reflective practice. Thematic analysis identified themes relating to key innovative features of the course and suggestions for improvements. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Preliminary evaluation suggests that EDSA is valued by clinicians to enhance their knowledge, skills and ability to improve eating disorder patient care.

Doctors are striking for a pay-rise, but better conditions are needed to make them feel valued. Key insights from New Zealand.

Degradation of junior doctors pay has led to strikes in the UK. Improved pay is important, however to feel valued at work, doctors must have good conditions as well. The author describes how their experience working in New Zealand (NZ) highlighted several insights into how better working conditions make doctors feel more valued. Three factors are discussed which improve doctors daily experience. Firstly, the use of 'relief doctors', who cover inevitable absences caused by sickness or holiday, allow maintenance of proper staffing levels. Secondly, NZ doctors get 6 weeks of paid study leave to prepare for exams, whereas in UK this does not exist. Lastly, in NZ meals are provided whilst at work, this is not the case in the UK. NZ demonstrates appreciation for its doctors through real and tangible improvements to their working environment. In the UK, pay needs to be improved, but so do working conditions.

Knowledge and Attitude Towards the Elderly Among Doctors and Medical Students: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION:  There is a continuous rise in the total number and percentage of elders globally, and as such, they are expected to utilize healthcare services more often. Therefore, this study aimed to determine doctors' and students' current knowledge and attitudes toward elders and compare those findings with other studies worldwide. The specific objectives of this study were to determine and compare the differences in attitudes between medical students and doctors regarding geriatrics. This comparison will focus on the following four key domains: social values, resource distribution, compassion, and medical care. Another objective was to assess the knowledge of medical students and doctors regarding geriatric topics. This assessment will help determine the necessity for interventions such as educational programs and workshops on geriatrics. METHODS: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted by disseminating a Google Forms survey to medical students and doctors. The survey included the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Geriatrics Attitudes Scale and the UCLA Geriatrics Knowledge Test. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 29.0.2.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). RESULTS:  A total number of 126 medical students and 72 doctors filled out the survey. Both medical students and doctors demonstrated moderate scores on the attitudes scale, with overall average scores of 2.92 out of 5 and 2.93 out of 5, respectively. As for knowledge, medical students achieved an average score of 41%, while doctors attained an average score of 43%. CONCLUSION:  This study provides significant insights regarding the knowledge and attitudes of students and doctors and attitudes towards geriatrics. The moderate attitudes score and poor knowledge score across both groups indicate the need for medical educators in Oman to further emphasize and teach about geriatrics in medical curricula.

Schwartz Rounds: Supporting the emotional wellbeing of our future healthcare workforce.

There is a pressing need to increase the availability of emotional support to healthcare professionals in training and those in early career, in particular junior doctors. Schwartz Rounds provide a space for staff and students to reflect on the emotional impact of their work. The Rounds are a multidisciplinary forum for all staff and students working in healthcare settings. The key premise is that supporting healthcare staff and students' wellbeing, providing a way for them to gain insight into their feelings and those that they work with, helps them to work compassionately with patients. This article describes the current NHS context concerns for healthcare staff and students and provides information about Schwartz Rounds and how their counter-cultural nature can help to address current workforce challenges, especially in relation to medical students and junior doctors. Implications for research are discussed.

Gender diversity in radiology: Shedding light on the 256 shades of grey.

INTRODUCTION: Despite medical school cohorts being composed of approximately 50% men and women, trainee positions in Clinical Radiology remain predominantly occupied by men. This study aims to identify reasons behind the gender gap, explore why more women are not pursuing a career in Clinical Radiology and to assess if there are gender differences in these reasons. METHODS: Prospective multi-centre study using a voluntary, anonymous questionnaire aimed at senior Medical Students and Junior Doctors. RESULTS: A total of 318 participants responded to the questionnaire - 197 women (61.9%), 114 men (35.8%), 4 non-binary (1.3%), 2 preferred not to answer gender (0.6%), 1 I/they (0.3%). The most common reasons for not considering Clinical Radiology as a specialty include 'perceived limited patient contact' (62%), 'never/rarely exposed to it' (59%) and 'too lonely' (49%). Reasons with the largest gender discrepancies were 'too technology heavy' and 'limited patient contact', both cited more frequently by women. Most respondents indicated that their opinions of Clinical Radiology may change with more exposure during medical school, more patient contact and more mentorship. CONCLUSION: This study has revealed multiple reasons why women may not pursue specialty training in Clinical Radiology. Notable differences were found in the reasonings provided by men and women. Limited Clinical Radiology exposure and mentorship in medical school result in a lack of interest in this specialty as a career option. A proposed solution is to offer more medical school lectures and more junior doctor rotations to debunk stereotypes that may be negatively impacting opinions on Clinical Radiology. More mentorship of Medical Students and Junior Doctors, particularly from women, may also help decrease the gender gap.

The development of the neurocritical care specialty in China based on the analysis of neurocritical care unit volume and quality.

PURPOSE: Through three neurocritical care unit (NCCU) surveys in China, we tried to understand the development status of neurocritical care and clarify its future development. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional survey method and self-report questionnaires, the number and quality of NCCUs were investigated through three steps: administering the questionnaire, sorting the survey data, and analyzing the survey data. RESULTS: At the second and third surveys, the number of NCCUs (76/112/206) increased by 47% and 84%, respectively. The NCCUs were located in tertiary grade A hospitals or teaching hospitals (65/100/181) in most provinces (24/28/29). The numbers of full-time doctors (359/668/1337) and full-time nurses (904/1623/207) in the NCCUs increased, but the doctor-bed ratio and nurse-bed ratio were still insufficient (0.4:1 and 1.3:1). CONCLUSION: In the past 20 years, the growth rate of NCCUs in China has accelerated, while the allocation of medical staff has been insufficient. Although most NCCU hospital bed facilities and instruments and equipment tend to be adequate, there are obvious defects in some aspects of NCCUs.

Consulting doctors online after offline treatment: investigating the effects of online information on patients' effective use of online follow-up services.

Introduction: The use of online follow-up services (OFUS) is becoming an increasingly important supplement to hospital care. Through OFUS, patients can find their doctors in online health communities (OHCs) and receive remote medical follow-ups after hospital treatment. However, the rate of effective use of OFUS by current patients is still low, and there is an urgent need for research to investigate the online information factors that affect patients' effective use of OFUS. Methods: Based on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of persuasion and an analysis of a panel dataset including 3,672 doctors in a leading OHC in China, this study explores how online information from doctors' knowledge contributions and patient feedback influences patients' effective use of OFUS. Results: The results show that both doctors' knowledge contributions and patient feedback positively influence patients' effective use of OFUS. Doctors' paid knowledge contributions and patients' paid feedback have stronger persuasive effects than doctors' free knowledge contributions and patients' free feedback, respectively. Moreover, there is a substitutional relationship between doctors' paid and free knowledge contributions and between patients' paid and free feedback in influencing patients' effective use of OFUS. Discussion: The findings of this study suggest that OHC platforms and healthcare providers should account not only for the persuasive effects of doctors' knowledge contributions and patient feedback but also for influential differences and relationships between the types of doctors' knowledge contributions and patient feedback to better persuade patients to effectively use OFUS.

The new Foundation Programme Mental Health Curriculum: foundation doctors' perceptions of its importance and their competency: pre-post psychiatric placement evaluation study.

AIMS AND METHOD: The new 2021 UK Foundation Programme Curriculum mandates foundation doctors to acquire mental health competencies. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychiatry placements in facilitating competency attainment, foundation doctors' perceived importance of acquiring these and their preferred teaching methods. Utilising Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework, the study employed a pre-post intervention design assessing the impact of psychiatry placements on 135 foundation doctors across three cohorts from August 2021 to March 2022. RESULTS: Initially, foundation doctors assigned high importance to mental health competencies. Post-placements, this perceived importance improved slightly, whereas that of clinical skills scenarios slightly decreased. Significant confidence increases were observed in recognising and assessing specific psychiatric disorders. Foundation doctors favoured small seminar groups and on-the-job ad hoc teaching. Qualitative insights underscored the need for context-specific teaching. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Psychiatry placements enhance foundation doctors' confidence and perceived importance of mental health competencies as specified by the curriculum. Addressing clinical scenario gaps through context-specific teaching and transferable skills development is essential. Customised teaching approaches, especially small seminars and ad hoc teaching, hold promise for effective mental health training.

From plaster casts to picket lines: Public support for industrial action in the National Health Service in England.

This paper explores public sentiment towards strike action among healthcare workers, as a result of their perceived inadequate pay. By analysing survey data collected in England between 2022 and 2023, the study focuses on NHS nurses and junior doctors, due to their critical role in delivering essential public services. Results indicate higher public support for strikes by nurses and junior doctors compared to other professions such as postal workers, teachers, rail workers, airport workers, civil servants and university lecturers. However, variation in support for strikes by healthcare workers is observed across societal segments. Significant disparities in support are linked to individual political affiliations, left-right ideological positions and trust in the NHS. In short, nonconservative voters, individuals leaning towards left-wing politics and those with greater trust in the NHS demonstrate higher likelihoods of supporting strikes by health workers. These findings carry implications for future strike decisions and highlight specific target groups for enhanced communication efforts to garner increased public support.